Categories
College Hockey Recruiting Girls Hockey Parents Women's College Hockey Women's Hockey Youth Hockey

How to Pick a Hockey Academy

As the new hockey season begins, many girls and their parents will begin the process of looking at hockey academies for next fall. We went through this process last year with the schools most folks would consider the top three girls hockey academies in the U.S.  Here are some of the key learnings from our experience and how our daughter made her decision on which one was right for her.

This post is less about the specific hockey academy my daughter chose to attend this year, and more about the various factors that went into her decision that anyone considering going to a female hockey academy should consider.

In addition, this isn’t meant as a critique of any program – each program has their pros and cons – which is why none of the programs are specifically mentioned. And while there were significant differences in the “candidate experience” for how my daughter was treated by each school during the process, that topic won’t be covered here.

Context: Factors schools look at to be interested in your player

Just like in the work world, recruiting is a two-way street. One of the first items to consider is how good is your player? Being a very good player is a necessary but not sufficient requirement for admission and selection. In addition schools also look at the following:

  • Grades and academic recommendations
  • Year/grade of entry into the program
  • Personality fit with the program
  • Long term player goals

The  application process and essay questions helps schools with assessing many of these factors.

Each player’s journey is unique

Each application is unique because there are a number of attributes that are distinct for the school and the student-athlete.  As an example, my daughter was already a sophomore when applying to these schools, and therefore the number of openings for a player who would only attend 2 (or possibly 3) years at the school did indeed impact her consideration. Specifically, the number of spots open for her position (defense) and her age varied by program, since the school needs to have the right balance of ages across both the 16U and 19Uteams. They can’t have 10 D with the same graduation year.

Priorities for Parents & Players:

Here are the 8 factors that we considered for evaluating the three hockey academies (in priority order):

  1. Coaching
  2. Academics
  3. Team Culture
  4. Hockey Facilities
  5. Boarding facilities
  6. Location (distance from home and amenities)
  7. Cost
  8. Recruiting visibility

All the school players get great exposure to college coaches.  And while many players play college hockey, not all of them play DI – so it is no guarantee that getting into a hockey academy will mean a  DI scholarship or playing in the Ivy League.

Breaking Down the Eight Factors in Evaluating Hockey Academies

1. Coaching

The most important factor was clearly player development. Where did we think our daughter would be the best she could be? And since coaches and skill development are critical to her success, over the two or three years should would be attending, we did back-channel references on all the coaches she would likely be interacting with from current parents and alumni players from each program.

A few questions that you should ask the coaches:

 a) Will there be a coach who knows how to coach my player’s specific position? This is even more important for goaltenders.

 b) What is the coach’s philosophy about ice time during the season and playoffs? How do you trade off winning vs development?

c)  If the player is not on the top line, will they still develop by getting game ice time and receiving productive feedback  from the coaching staff (not just being criticized for errors)? 

There were indeed significant differences for these answers across programs.

.

2. Academics

Getting a solid education while playing hockey is obviously quite important. And while all the hockey academies send players to top schools, it seemed that some were better than others at actually preparing students for the next level in their education. I have no doubt most girls will rise to the occasion when they get to college, but we definitely saw big variation in our perception on how well our daughter would be prepared for university level courses.

Note: If academics were the #1 priority for a player, they should probably consider a New England prep school.

3. Team Culture

At most of the hockey academies, players come from all over the country and were typically the best players on their team prior to arrival. As a result, their attitude towards their teammates and the camaraderie seemed to differ across schools. Some were more humble and accessible, while at others, a sense of superiority, entitlement and cliques were more obvious. If you are going to spend 24 hours a day with your teammates, you will want to make sure you really like spending time with them.

4. Hockey Facilities

Candidly, some of the hockey and training infrastructure available at one of the schools is significantly better than the others.  Having 24 hour access to ice time is definitely an advantage for some academies. As well, off-ice training facilities and rehab resources can make a difference. The key is knowing what some of the trade-offs are between programs and which are “must-haves” vs. “nice-to-haves”. It is similar to women’s college teams, some have pro-level facilities, while other top name programs aren’t as lavish, but still consistently are Top 10 teams on the ice.

5. Boarding Facilities

Factors like room size, number of roommates, access to kitchens and food can make a difference to the player.  Four people to room is different than two to a room. Meals are obviously a big deal and getting the high quality meals at the right time of day is very important.  Other small amenities can matter too, for example, my daughter likes to bake – so that was one of the factors that was a positive for her in her choice.

6. Location

Depending on where you live and how independent your player is, location can matter.  Distance from home and the amenities surrounding the school may impact your experience.  For us, we would be travelling from the west coast, so it was less important from a parent point of view since all of them were far from home.

7. Cost

Obviously this varies by school and your specific needs.  This would include tuition, boarding, hockey and travel costs. Not just the player costs, but also the cost for the parents to travel to games and to the school.  There are differences between schools, but you would need to assess the difference in value to you individually for your specific situation.

8. Recruiting Visibility

While this is very important, the reality is that all the U.S. hockey academies are highly scouted and have the top coaches watching many of their games in-person and online. If your player is good enough for their school, they will get seen.  Even more importantly, your player’s coaches will have existing relationships with almost all DI and top DIII schools.  This is a major asset the academies provide and will certainly give your player access that many other club programs probably don’t have. 

Summary

As mentioned above, every player’s path is different, but these were the key themes and factors that drove our daughters decision. If you had a different experience, additional thoughts or questions. Feel free to reach out on social media or here to share your experience.

Categories
Champs Coach of the day Girls Hockey Women's College Hockey Women's Hockey

Today’s Coach of The Day: Matt Desrosiers

Matt Desrosiers

Today’s  Champs Coach of the Day is Matt Desrosiers. Matt is the Head Coach of the Clarkson Women’s Ice Hockey team and two-time national champion. The Golden Knights were recently ranked at #10 in the pre-season polls.

Create a player profile and connect with Matt on Champs App. https://profile.champs.app/h/matt-desrosiers

Categories
Champs Coach of the day Girls Hockey Women's College Hockey Women's Hockey

Today’s Coach of The Day: Allison Coomey

Allison Coomey

Today’s  Champs Coach of the Day is Allison Coomey. Allison is the Associate Head Coach of the Penn State Women’s Ice Hockey team. The Nittany Lions were just ranked #14 in the pre-season polls.

Create a player profile and connect with Allison on Champs App. https://profile.champs.app/h/allison-coomey  

Categories
Champs Coach of the day Girls Hockey Women's College Hockey Women's Hockey

Today’s Coach of The Day: Jim Plumer

Jim Plumer

Today’s Coach of the Day is Vermont Head Coach Jim Plumer. This week, the UVM Women’s Hockey Team was ranked #13 in the USCHO women’s ice hockey preseason poll. Check out Jim Plumer’s Champs App profile.

Create a player profile and connect with Jim on Champs App.

Categories
College Hockey Recruiting Women's College Hockey Women's Hockey

Q3 2022 DI Women’s College Hockey Commitment Rate Update

This is an update to a previous post from April, 2022 on “Q1 2022 Women’s College Hockey Commitment Rate Update”.

2022 Commits

There were four 2022 announced commitments since April (Syracuse, St. Michaels 2 and RPI). This shows there still may the odd opening at a school even just a few months before the start of the fall semester. Since the 2022 school year has started, this will be our last analysis of the 2022 commits.

2023 Commits

2023 commits are still tracking at about 23% less than the last two years (40 commitments). Due to 5th year eligibility and grad transfers this seems about right and should be similar for incoming 2024 and possibly 2025s. However, with Assumption and Robert Morris starting to play in 2023 those schools may help bridge the gap in total commits. Both Assumption and Robert Morris have already started announcing their first few freshman commits (two each) – with RMU already having some players on campus and/or 2022 commits who are now starting in 2024.

2024 Commits

The first coming have been coming in since July with 15 public announcements that have been tracked. Most of them are for top hockey or Ivy league schools. This is the first class of players that could not commit until June 15th of their junior year because of the new NCAA recruiting rules. As a result, the current total number of commits 24 months before their start year is significantly below levels from previous years. It will be interesting to see the pace at which the gap closes this fall as potential recruits visit campus and meet the staff and players.

Goalies

Four of the 15 2024 commits are goalies (Clarkson 2, Cornell, Brown). For 2023, St. Anselm, Lindenwood and Assumption have added goalies since our last analysis.

Data assumptions:

  1. Data commitment dates – source: collegecommitments.com and Champs App analysis
  2. Transfers between DI programs are not included in the number of commits
  3. Total number of publicly announced commitments for 2021 was 215 and for 2022 it was 210
Categories
Coach page Coaching College Hockey Recruiting Women's College Hockey

NCAA Coaches Directory

Alyssa
Gagliardi

Skills Development Coach

John
Harrington

Head Coach – Minnesota State Mavericks

Chris Donovan

Head Coach – St Michael’s Purple Knights

Kerstin Matthews

Head Coach – St Marks School

Jenna Trubiano

Head Coach – Michigan Wolverines

Cara Morey

Head Coach – Princeton Tigers

Jack Sweeney

Head Coach – Assumption University

Bethany Brausen

Assistant Coach – St Thomas Tommies

Jackie Crum

Assistant Coach – Wisconsin Badgers

Chris Baudo

Head Coach – Nazareth Golden Flyers

VICTORIA BLAKE

Assistant Coach – Sacred Heart Pioneers

BRitni Smith

Head Coach – Syracuse Orange

JoSH FUNK

Head Coach – Hood Blazers

DAVID LABAFF

Head Coach – Wilkes Colonels

JEn Kindret

Head Coach – St Anselm Hawks

Chris mackenzie

Head Coach – Connecticut Huskies

jon benchich

Assistant Coach – Lebanon Valley Duthmen

ken deming

Head Coach – Delaware Blue Hens

Mia del rosso

Assistant Coach – Trinity Bantams

Jessica Scott

Assistant Coach – Minnesota Golden Gophers

Brice Baricevic

Assistant Coach – Arcadia Knights

jess koizumi

Former NCAA Coach

max gavin

Assistant Coach – Dartmouth Big Green

Makenna newkirk

Assistant Coach – Penn State Nittany Lions

john Briggs

Head Coach – Morrisville Mustangs

megan quinn

Assistant Coach – Syracuse Orange

annie rush

Assistant Coach – Williams Ephs

Marissa O’Neil

Head Coach – Bowdoin Polar Bears

sean levin

Head Coach – Rider Broncs

Mike HinklE

Equipment Manager – Alvernia Golden Wolves

Elizabeth WULF

Assistant Coach – Connecticut Huskies

Brian Idalski

Head Coach – St Cloud State Huskies

Peter Elander

Associate Head Coach – Ohio State Buckeyes

Jim
Plumer

Head Coach
Vermont Catamounts

Laura Bellamy

Head Coach – Harvard Crimson

David Stockdale

Head Coach – Franklin Pierce Ravens

Tara Connolly

Assistant Coach – RPI Engineers

Tara Watchorn

Head Coach – Boston University Terriers

Jim Scanlan

Head Coach – Bemidji State University Beavers

Allison Coomey

Associate Head Coach – Penn State University Nittany Lions

Cari
Coen

Assistant Coach – Bishop Kearney BK Selects Girls 19AAA

Katelyn Parker

Seattle Kraken Player Development Coach

DAN koch

Associate Head Coach – Wisconsin Badgers

Jackie Kooistra

Head Coach –
Aurora Spartans

Liz keady norton

Head Coach – Dartmouth Big Green

RACHEL GRAMPP

Head Coach – Buffalo State Bengals

MOlly Engstrom

Head Coach – University of Maine

Kelly Rider

Head Coach – Curry College

jeff giesen

Associate Coach – Minnesota State Mavericks

TOMMASO BUCCI

Assistant Coach – Mercyhurst Lakers

Jordan ott

Assistant Coach – Chatham Cougars

gina mclaughlin

Head Coach – Neumann Knights

Taylor ham

Assistant Coach – Connecticut College Camels

tim crowley

Assistant Coach – Cornell Big Red

Chris ardito

Assistant Coach – Union Dutchwomen

Chris wells

Head Coach – St Lawrence Saints

eliza kelley

Head Coach – Worcester State Lancers

kelly nash

Head Coach – Long Island Sharks

megan myers

Assistant Coach – Boston University Terriers

lee-J Mirasolo

Head Coach – Stonehill Skyhawks

courtney kessel

Associate Head Coach – Boston University Terriers

eric long

Head Coach – Tabor Seawolves

dave flint

Head Coach – Northeastern Huskies

maura crowell

Head Coach – Minnesota-Duluth Bulldogs

Matt
Desrosiers

Head Coach – Clarkson Golden Knights

Logan
Bittle

Head Coach –
Robert Morris Colonials

Josh
Sciba

Head Coach – Union College Dutchwomen

Gretchen Silverman

Head Coach – Post University Eagles

Jake Anderson

Head Coach – Bishop Kearney BK Selects Girls 16AAA

Mike
Sisti

Head Coach – Mercyhurst Lakers

Matt Kelly

Head Coach – Providence Friars

Olivia Soares

Assistant Coach – Union College Dutchwomen

Erin Hamlen

Head Coach – Merrimack Warriors

Tom O’Malley

Head Coach – Sacred Heart Pioneers

JENNIFER WILSON

Head Coach – Lake Forest Foresters

MICHAEL O’GRADY

Head Coach – Chatham Cougars

Katie zimmerman

Head Coach – Western New England Golden Bears

michael barrett

Head Coach – Nichols Bisons

KIRSTI hussey

Assistant Coach – University of Maine

justin simpson

Assistant Coach – Brown Bears

hannah nelson

Assistant Coach –
 Buffalo State Bengals

Tori emoff

Head Coach – Stevenson Mustangs

Jordin Pardoski

Assistant Coach – RIT Tigers

ashley salerno

Head Coach – Turkish National Team

Erica kromm

Assistant Coach – Yale Bulldogs

nora maclaine

Assistant Coach – Long Island Sharks

Nick carpenito

Associate Head Coach – Northeastern Huskies

MIRA JALOSUO

Assistant Coach – St Cloud State Huskies

amanda alessi

Assistant Coach – Quinnipiac Bobcats

brent hill

Assistant Coach – Quinnipiac Bobcats

mel ruzzi

Head Coach – Brown Bears

moe bradley

Head Coach – UMass Boston Beacons

eric Hench

Head Coach – York Spartans

Dave standley

Assistant Coach – Virginia Tech Hokies

mark bolding

Head Coach – Yale Bulldogs